Stewart v. Tinsley
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
We will refer to plaintiff in error as petitioner.
Petitioner filed for writ of habeas corpus in the district court, Pueblo, alleging that a plea of guilty entered by him to the charge of robbery was coerced; that he was not afforded benefit of counsel; and that' the court, in accepting his tendered plea of guilty, did not advise him of the sentence provided by law for the crime involved. The petition for the writ was denied without a hearing, and it is to this action of the court that he diiects this writ of error.
We hold that petitioner raised no question properly justiciable in habeas…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stilley v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Vanderhoof v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Martinez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Specht v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Titmus v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mulkey v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Wayne K. Patterson, Warden v. Charles Ansel HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Jacobs v. CarmelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Martinez v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Shearer v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.