Legal Opinion

Wayne K. Patterson, Warden v. Charles Ansel Hampton

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1966No. 8346PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment after full hearing in a habeas corpus proceedings in which the trial court held that the appellee had been deprived of his constitutional right to a sanity hearing touching his mental capacity to enter a guilty plea to a state charge of assault with intent to commit rape. The case was accordingly continued to permit the st©te to afford the petitioner a hearing within sixty days. Upon failure to do so, the matter was to be reconsidered. The threshold question is whether petitioner had exhausted his state remedies under Rule 35(b), Colorado…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Case v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Roberts v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  3. Stewart v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. Jere Lane Henry v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. Jack Allen Barber v. Ray H. Page, Warden, Oklahoma State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. James William Smith v. State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Arthur J. Watson v. Wayne K. Patterson, Warden, Colorado State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Jones v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICTSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. People v. GillingsColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Cappelli v. Honorable DemlowColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API