Legal Opinion
Stilley v. Tinsley
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided August 26, 1963No. 19940PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall
The parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. We refer to them by name.
On June 28, 1961, Stilley filed in the trial court his amended petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging: (1) that Tinsley, as Warden of the Colorado State Penitentiary, is unlawfully confining him in said penitentiary as an alleged parole violator; (2) that he was convicted of burglary in the Denver District Court and was, on November 24, 1954, sentenced to said penitentiary for a period of time not exceeding ten years and not less than one year, and that mittimus was issued in conformity with such…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Knewel v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ex Parte Tom TongSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hart v. BestSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Moody v. CorsentinoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Horton v. SuthersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Duran v. PriceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People Ex Rel. Wyse v. DISTRICT COURT, TWENTIETH JDSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.