Legal Opinion

Titmus v. Tinsley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 26, 1963No. 20629PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

Plaintiff in error, to whom we will refer by name, is here by writ of error to review proceedings in the district court of Weld county which he contends amounted to an erroneous denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Titmus was charged by information filed in cause number 5628 in the district court of Weld county with the crime of statutory rape. At his request counsel was appointed to defend him and he thereafter entered a plea of guilty to the crime charged. His application for probation was denied and he was sentenced by the court to imprisonment in the Colorado state…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGrath v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. People ex rel. Metzger v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Valentine v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  2. Shearer v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  3. King v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. Shearer v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API