Legal Opinion

Shook v. Bristow

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1952No. 32191PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action arose from a collision which occurred between two automobiles at the intersection of the Seattle-Tacoma highway and Ardena and Anderson roads, a few miles northeast of Tacoma. The Seattle-Tacoma highway, commonly known as U. S. 99, is an arterial highway, while the intersecting roads are not.

For convenience, we shall refer to plaintiff and defendant husbands as if they were the sole parties to the action.

Plaintiff, the disfavored driver, sought to recover general and special damages in the sum of $11,065. Defendant, who was traveling toward Tacoma on the arterial, cross-complained…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Shultes v. HalpinWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Bennett v. KarnowskyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Emanuel v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Winslow v. MellWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Ennis v. RingWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. System Tank Lines, Inc. v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hough v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Hough v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API