Legal Opinion

Ennis v. Ring

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1956No. 33607PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

February 15, 1944, Walter S. Wynhoff and Ethel O. Wynhoff, his wife, executed a lease of a forty-three-hundred-acre ranch to Harold E. Ring and Edwin W. Ring. It provided for a term of ten years and one month, terminating April 1,1954, and for an annual cash rental of seventeen hundred dollars, to be paid on or before December 1st of each year, with the exception of the last year of the lease, when the rent was payable on or before October 1, 1954. The lessees were to have the use of certain Indian-owned land (the “Henrietta Hazelhurst Allotment”) which was then under lease to the Wynhoffs.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. High v. HighWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Winslow v. MellWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ferris v. BlumhardtWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Shook v. BristowWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Kelly Springfield Tire Co. v. FaulknerWashington Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Caruso v. Local Union No. 690Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Fluke Capital & Management Services Co. v. RichmondWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. EppensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. Ennis v. RingWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. LaHue v. Coca Cola Bottling, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API