Ingersoll v. Odendahl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
.Action in the district court for Ramsey county by tbe administrators of the estate of Charles Wirth, deceased, to recover possession of certain tracts of real estate ‘and $2,000 for the nse and occupancy of the same. The case was tried before Hanft, J., who made findings and as conclusions of law ordered judgment in favor of defendants for costs and disbursements. From an order denying plaintiff’s and intervener’s motion for a new trial, they appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
This action is brought by administrators of the estate of Dr. Carl *430Wirth, deceased, to recover possession of several tracts of real estate, which were owned by Dr. Wirth in his lifetime. The court found for defendants. The defendant Amanda H. Odendahl was the daughter and sole heir of deceased. Defendants claim that Dr. Wirth, a man advanced in years, executed and delivered a deed to his daughter of all the property in controversy. A deed of this purport, bearing date June 11, 1913, was recorded June 13, 1914. Dr. Wirth died in April, 1914.
It was claimed on the trial that all but one of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Innes v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Conlan v. GraceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Varley v. SimsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Eyre v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Lee v. FletcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Exsted v. ExstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Bowen v. WillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Kessler v. Von BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- McGrath v. PothenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Cloutier v. CharestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.