Legal Opinion
Meas v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 22, 2005No. 32818-6-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
fl
Bridgewater, J.
— Sarith Meas appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment against him. Meas was injured in a motor vehicle accident by a third party and received collision damages under his insurance policy with State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. Meas then sought to recover both property and personal injury damages from the tortfeasor; but State Farm, acting under a provision of Meas’s insurance policy involving collision loss, recovered its property damage payment directly from the tortfeasor’s insurance company before Meas had settled his personal injury claim.
¶2 We hold that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Covell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Thiringer v. American Motors InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- M.W. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- S&K Motors, Inc. v. Harco National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- S & K Motors, Inc. v. Harco Nat. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Averill v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Averill v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Meas v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.