Legal Opinion
Butler v. State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1957PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The question on this appeal is whether a school district, which elects to take the benefits of the Workmen’s Compensation Law as an employer engaged in a nonhazardous occupation and expressly limits the desired coverage to the school janitor, nevertheless becomes *332thereby subject to the provisions of the Act as to all its employees including its teachers.
On January 7, 1938, School District No. 3, Gilliam County, Oregon, filed with the commission on a printed form prepared by it a “Notice of Election to Contribute to the Industrial Accident Fund.” The application contained the following:
“The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Portland v. DuntleyOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- King v. Union Oil CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Union Pacific Railroad v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Kelly v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Bos v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Standard Insurance v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Adelbert G. Clostermann, of the Estate of Charles W. Feist, Deceased v. The Gates Rubber Company, a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- State v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Manning v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Babb v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.