Legal Opinion
Adelbert G. Clostermann, of the Estate of Charles W. Feist, Deceased v. The Gates Rubber Company, a Colorado Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 13, 1968No. 21774_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.
This is a workmen’s compensation case involving the laws of the State of Oregon. The question presented is whether the appellee, Gates Rubber Company, (hereafter “Gates”) complied with the Oregon Workmen’s Compensation Act so as to preclude additional recovery by appellant in an independent action, after the decedent Feist applied for and received workmen’s compensation benefits.
Jurisdiction in the district court was based on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Jurisdiction of this court is pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
FACTS
We must consider the evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- W. G. Nuelsen and Harriet M. Nuelsen v. L. C. SorensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Joseph Stacher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Butler v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Latham v. Technar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
- United States v. John Babbs, and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Charles D. Long v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.