City National Bank of Columbus v. Jordan
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Palo Alto District' Court.— HoN. D. E. Coyle, Judge. AotioN at law upon a promissory note. There was a directed verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.—
1Opinion of the Court
Weavee, J.—
The petition is based upon a promissory note made August 24, 1903, for the sum of $1,000 and interest, payable July 1, 1905, to the order of McLaughlin Bros., by whom it is alleged to have been indorsed and transferred to the plaintiff before due -and without notice of any defense thereto. The answer of the defendants is not very clearly stated, but we may deduce therefrom the following defenses: The first of these is based upon an alleged rescission of the contract of purchase because of false representations made by the payees or their selling agent concerning the horse, its…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Ormsby v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- McKown v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Hard v. LeurendusNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Lyon v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Ireland v. ScharpenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Halligan v. Lone Tree Farmers ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Connelly v. Greenfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- International Harvester Co. of America v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Leavitt v. ThurstonUtah Supreme Court · 1911
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.