State v. Travis Wade Amaral
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BRUTINEL,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 Travis Wade Amaral, then seventeen years old, pleaded guilty to first-degree murder and other charges and was sentenced to life in prison. We consider whether advances in juvenile psychology and neurology in the intervening twenty-two years support a “colorable claim” of newly discovered evidence requiring an evidentiary hearing on Amaral’s petition for post-conviction relief. Because the sentencing court considered the distinctive attributes of Amaral’s youth, we hold that Amaral did not present a colorable claim.
I. BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In 1993, Amaral…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State of Arizona v. Phil GutierrezArizona Supreme Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State of Arizona v. valencia/healerArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State of Arizona v. Abel Daniel HidalgoArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- State of Arizona v. Larry Dean AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2024
- State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- State of Arizona v. Knute Eckhard KolmannArizona Supreme Court · 2016
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.