Legal Opinion

State v. Travis Wade Amaral

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2016No. CR-15-0090-PRPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BRUTINEL,

opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 Travis Wade Amaral, then seventeen years old, pleaded guilty to first-degree murder and other charges and was sentenced to life in prison. We consider whether advances in juvenile psychology and neurology in the intervening twenty-two years support a “colorable claim” of newly discovered evidence requiring an evidentiary hearing on Amaral’s petition for post-conviction relief. Because the sentencing court considered the distinctive attributes of Amaral’s youth, we hold that Amaral did not present a colorable claim.

I. BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In 1993, Amaral…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. State of Arizona v. Phil GutierrezArizona Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. valencia/healerArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State of Arizona v. Abel Daniel HidalgoArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State of Arizona v. Larry Dean AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2024
  4. State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State of Arizona v. Knute Eckhard KolmannArizona Supreme Court · 2016

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API