Legal Opinion

Threlkeld v. Malcragson Land Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

It goes without saying that there could be no Us pendens on the entire 194 acres. The record discloses that the land that the controversy is about is approximately 5 acres and was first conveyed by plaintiffs to Maleragson Land Co., Inc., and by it with other land and Governor Heights, Inc., certain land, to Beverly Hills, Inc., totaling some 194 acres. The Beverly Hills, Inc., conveyed the 194 acres to the Central Bank & Trust Co., trustee, to secure-an indebtedness of $825,000, due various bondholders. The deed of trust from the Maleragson Land Co., Inc., to Robert S. Brown, trustee for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. . SheetsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Cox v. Wall.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Helsabeck v. VassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Roberts v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Pierce v. . MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. . KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Cutter v. CUTTER REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Parker v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Jarrett v. . HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API