Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Knox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 23, 1942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.

When an action is instituted to foreclose a duly registered deed of trust, must notice of the proceedings be cross-indexed as required by C. S., 501, so as to protect the mortgage creditor against subsequent purchasers from the mortgagor or his assigns who are parties to the action? We answer in the negative.

The law of lis pendens stems back to the Eoman law where the rule was “a thing concerning which there is a controversy is prohibited during suit, from being alienated.” The same rule was formulated and adopted by Lord Bacon, thereafter becoming firmly fixed in the English law, inherited…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Collins v. Davis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Jones v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Sills v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Dorman v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Realty Portfolio, Inc. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Chavis v. GibbsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  3. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. BurtonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1984
  4. Mammoth Cave Production Credit Ass'n v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Valentine v. Portland Timber & Land Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API