Legal Opinion
Canadian Indemnity Company v. Leo Tacke
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 11, 1958No. 15704_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, hereafter the Insurer, appeals from a declaratory judgment of the District Court of Montana in a diversity suit holding valid a predated policy of insurance issued by it, insuring Leo Tacke against his liability for personal injury not exceeding $10,000 and property damage not exceeding $5,000. The judgment v/as solely as to the validity of the policy.
There was a collision between Tacke’s Chevrolet and a car containing a Mr. and Mrs. Kissee in which Mrs. Kissee claimed she was injured and for which she brought suit which is pending and not yet tried.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- M'lanahan v. the Universal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- United States v. PatryasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- El Dia Ins. Co. v. SinclairCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Pendergast v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- GenCorp, Inc. v. American International UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Burch v. Commonwealth County Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
- Affiliated FM Ins. v. Kushner CompaniesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- AMERICAN MILLENNIUM INS. CO. v. BerganzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Gencorp, Inc. v. American International UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.