Legal Opinion

Rogue Flyfishers, Inc. v. Water Policy Review Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 30, 1983No. CA A24417PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of an action taken by the Water Policy Review Board (Board), arguing that the action constituted the promulgation of a rule and that the rule is invalid because, inter alia, the Board failed to comply with provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) that govern the adoption of rules. Because we conclude that the Board did not promulgate a rule by the action challenged here, we dismiss the petition for review.

The act in question is a vote by the Board to instruct its staff to base future stream flow computations on the amount of water present in a given stream…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burke v. Children's Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. League of Women Voters of Central Lane County v. Lane County Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Oregon Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Steamboaters v. Winchester Water Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Pioneer Trust Bank, N.A. v. Mental Health DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Smith v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Justice Resource Center v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Matthews v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education ex rel. University of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API