Legal Opinion

Pioneer Trust Bank, N.A. v. Mental Health Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1987No. 86-MH-001 and 86-MH-002; CA A42876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

The issue is whether circuit court or this court has jurisdiction to review a Mental Health Division (Division) order requiring petitioner to reimburse the cost of providing care for petitioner’s trust’s beneficiaries. The circuit court, not this court, has jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss this judicial review.

Mary and Mavis Hawkins have been patients at a state institution for a number of years. They also are the beneficiaries of a trust fund established by their parents and administered by petitioner, Pioneer Trust Bank (Bank). Division issued an order determining that Bank, as trustee,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. School District No. 48 v. Fair Dismissal Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. League of Women Voters of Central Lane County v. Lane County Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Harris v. CraigOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Rogue Flyfishers, Inc. v. Water Policy Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Steamboaters v. Winchester Water Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FarleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Webster v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. FarleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API