Legal Opinion

Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 14, 1991No. 15A91PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

The issue we are presented with in this case is whether a trade creditor to a closely held corporation is a third-party beneficiary to the corporation’s contract with an accounting firm for the performance of an audit. The accounting firm agreed to perform an audit “in conformity with generally accepted auditing standards,” and furnished the audit to the corporation. The trade creditor did not see the audit but reviewed a summary of it published in a Dun & Bradstreet report, which apparently overstated the corporation’s actual financial position. Allegedly on the basis of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Hinson v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. American Trust Co. v. Catawba Sales & Processing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Chemical Realty Corp. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of HollywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Marcus Bros. Textiles, Inc. v. Price Waterhouse, LLPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Hunter v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Concord EFS, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Garner v. Rentenbach Constructors Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Holshouser v. Shaner Hotel Group Properties One Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API