Legal Opinion

Clouse v. Chairtown Motors, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 28, 1973No. 7322SC140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Plaintiff’s Appeal

Plaintiff assigns error to the action of the trial judge, allowing the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the issue of punitive damages, G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a). Plaintiff contends that, under the facts of this case, the issue of punitive damages should have been submitted to the jury.

In North Carolina, whether a party may recover punitive damages in an action for fraud depends on the character of the acts alleged to constitute fraud in each case. Swinton v. Realty Co., 236 N.C. 723, 73 S.E. 2d 785 (1953).

“In ordinary cases a recovery of exemplary,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Lewis v. ShaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Swinton v. Savoy Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Binder v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Montgomery v. . BladesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lazenby v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Hardy v. TolerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Burger Chef Systems, Inc. v. Melfred CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  4. Aaron v. Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Aaron v. Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API