Hardy v. Toler
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in allowing defendants’ motion for a directed verdict under Rule 50(b) as to the issue of punitive damages. We find no merit in this contention. Due to the similarity of the facts in this case to those presented in Clouse v. Motors, Inc., 17 N.C. App. 669, 195 S.E. 2d 327 (1973), we think the principle of law applied in the plaintiff’s appeal in that case is applicable here. Appropriate here are the following words from the opinion in Clouse by Judge Morris (p. 671) : “We hold that, taking all of the plaintiff’s evidence as true, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nunn v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Clouse v. Chairtown Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hyde v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- McDonald v. ScarboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Easley v. Rich Food Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Campbell Sales Grp., Inc. v. Niroflex by Jiufeng Furniture, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.