Legal Opinion
Echols v. Voisine
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 5, 1981No. Civ. A. 78-10165PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HARVEY, District Judge.
This is an action in which plaintiff, in pro per, vaguely alleges on-going violations of his civil rights, apparently in the form of an ever widening conspiracy to discriminate against him on the basis of race and to deny him his rights to due process. Defendants are numerous judicial and executive officers of the State of Michigan, several local attorneys and law firms, the Dow Chemical Company and certain of its employees, and other private persons. The Court uses the term “apparently” to reflect a fundamental problem which the Court, and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Lester Slotnick v. Harold StaviskeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re "Santa Barbara Like It Is Today" Copyright Infringement LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1982
- Leff v. NAC Agency, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
- Easley v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
- Echols v. VoisineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Robinson v. Michigan, State ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.