Legal Opinion
In Re Bosack v. Soward
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 2009No. 08-35248, 08-35458PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The slip opinion filed July 23, 2009, 573 F.3d 891, is amended as follows:
At slip opinion page 9514, fine 25, 573 F.3d at 900, after <did not disregard or ignore these cases. > insert <Nor did the panel improperly interpret these cases “to render [them] inapplicable to this case.” Comedy Club II, 553 F.3d at 1293. Its decision does not, therefore, amount to manifest disregard for the law. See, e.g., id.; Kyocera, 341 F.3d at 1003. >
At slip opinion page 9514, line 25, through page 9515, line 13, 573 F.3d at 900-01, delete <Whether the panel misinterpreted ...…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Lagstein v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS, LLOYD'S, LONDONCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Biller v. Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Johnson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Aspic Engineering and Constr. v. Ecc Centcom Constructors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Carolyn Burton v. Class Counsel and Party to ArbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.