Legal Opinion

Berneche v. Hess

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiff denies the right of the court to enter into an examination of the several alleged errors, for the reason that defendants have failed to file an authenticated bill of exceptions made by the trial judge. Plaintiff stipulated with the defendants that, in the appeal of the case to the Supreme Court, there might be attached to the transcript on appeal a full transcript of the testimony, containing the objections and rulings of the court, instructions requested and instructions given, motions for nonsuit and directed verdict, and that all thereof might be considered as a bill of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. GrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Dalton v. HazeletCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  3. Oxford & Coast Line R. v. Union Bank of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1907
  4. Thomsen v. GiebischOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Astoria v. ZindorfOregon Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Luedinghaus Lumber Co. v. StapletonOregon Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API