Legal Opinion
Thomsen v. Giebisch
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1918PublishedCited by 8 opinions
From Multnomah: George B. Bagley, Judge. In Banc. Motion to strike bill of exceptions from the files for tbe reason that it was not presented and settled witbin thirty days after the rendition of the judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
PER, CURIAM.
1. The judgment in this case was rendered on January 28, 1918. Rule 49 of the Circuit Court is as follows:
“Any party to a civil or criminal action may within thirty days after the entry of final judgment, tender a bill of exceptions.”
Rule 53 provides:
“The court, upon being satisfied that the adverse party or Ms attorney has had due notice thereof, may, on application of either party, grant an extension of time to file a bill of exceptions, or a statement of objections thereto, or fix a time for the settlement thereof, but written notice shall not be required.”
On March 4, 1918,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Malloy v. Marshall-Wells Hardware Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Keady v. United Rys. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Henrichsen v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Tallmadge v. HooperOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- National Council v. McGinnOregon Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Benson v. BirchOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Nealan v. RingOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Kruckman v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Luedinghaus Lumber Co. v. StapletonOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Finn v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.