Legal Opinion

Industrial Development Associates v. F.T.P., Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 31, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

GRUCCIO, J.A.D.

Following our remand pursuant to our decision in Industrial Development Assoc. v. Commercial Union, 222 N.J.Super. 281, 536 A.2d 787 (App.Div.1988), plaintiff Industrial Development Association (I.D.A.) appeals from the decision of the trial court granting defendant F.T.P., Inc.’s (F.T.P.) motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (j.n.o.v.). For the purposes of this opinion, we adopt the facts as presented in our earlier *470opinion with the exception that defendant Antonio Suarez remains a defendant. See id. at 284-87, 536 A.2d 787.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rider v. LynchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Bates v. GambinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. DiMarino v. WishkinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Milliken v. WoodwardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  5. Cox v. SantoroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carter Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Emar Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. Bergman v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. DillerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
  4. President v. JenkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  5. Bergman v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API