Legal Opinion
DiMarino v. Wishkin
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 8, 1984PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
195 N.J. Super. 390 (1984)
479 A.2d 444
GINA A. DIMARINO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RUBIN WISHKIN, D/B/A RUBINS VALET SERVICE, DEFENDANT AND THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
SIDNEY KATZ, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted October 26, 1983.
Decided August 8, 1984.
Before Judges FRITZ, FURMAN and DEIGHAN.
Horn, Kaplan, Goldberg & Gorny, attorneys for appellant (John J. Markwardt, on the brief).
Morgan E. Thomas, attorney for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by FRITZ, P.J.A.D.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory order certified by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Bates v. GambinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Citta v. Camden Fire Insurance Assoc., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Marano v. SabbioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
3Cited by30 opinions
- Carter Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Emar Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Grow Company, Inc. v. ChokshiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Rena, Inc. v. BrienNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Janicky v. Point Bay Fuel, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Avery v. Arthur E. Armitage AgencyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.