Legal Opinion

Bergman v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

742 A.2d 1101 (1999)

Herbert BERGMAN, Appellant,

v.

UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 12, 1999.

Filed December 6, 1999.

Edwin P. Smith, Philadelphia, for appellant.

William K. Conkin, Philadelphia, for appellee.

Before KELLY and MONTEMURO[*], JJ. and CIRILLO, President Judge Emeritus.

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal we must determine whether expert testimony should be required in cases involving allegations of bad faith in the context of insurance practices. Essentially, Appellant, Herbert Bergman, requests that this Court adopt a per se rule…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API