Kendrick v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) that denied him re-release on parole and ordered him to serve 28 months’ incarceration with a release date two days before his statutory good-time date. We have rejected petitioner’s arguments that the Board lacked the authority to take that action. Kessler v. Board of Parole, 145 Or App 584, 931 P2d 801 (1997); Bollinger v. Board of Parole, 142 Or App 81, 920 P2d 1111, rev allowed 324 Or 394 (1996).
Relying on Woolstrum v. Board of Parole, 141 Or App 332, 918 P2d 112, rev den 324 Or 395 (1996),…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kessler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Bollinger v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Woolstrum v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Troiano v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robert Lewis Himes v. S. Frank ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003