Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 3, 1928No. 11722PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for assault with intent to rape. The specific charge against appellant was an assault with intent to rape a female under the age of consent. Under all the formalities required by law he entered his plea of guilty and asked for a suspended sentence. The jury denied a recommendation for suspended sentence and assessed his punishment at six years in the penitentiary.

No bills of exception are brought forward complaining of any proceeding during the trial. The insufficiency of the evidence is the only question urged. By his plea of guilty appellant admitted the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Connor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Meggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nadir N. Ali and Mumtaz Ali v. Flessner Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API