Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1924No. 9074PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

— Appellant is charged by indictment with burglary. Upon a plea of guilty his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Evidence was introduced, part of which consisted of appellant’s confession. Notwithstanding the plea of guilty a motion for new trial was filed, one ground of which was that the verdict and judgment were not supported by the evidence. Article 566 C. C. P. reads as follows:

“Where a defendant in a case of felony persists in pleading guilty, if the punishment of the offense is not absolutely fixed by law, and beyond the discretion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Connor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Clinton Albert Alton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API