Connor v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
Conviction is for theft; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.
The alleged stolen property was two automobile casings.
From the State’s evidence, it was shown that the appellant, in company with one Lamlcin, sold the casings in question, with others, to the witness Lobert. Appellant testified and explained the matter, in substance, thus: That his employer was a dealer in casings; that in conversation with the witness Lamkin, a fellow-employee, Lam-kin said that if the appellant would get into the shipping department, he could make…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Woodall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Doans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Bunch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Meggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928