Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Erb

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1936No. Docket No. 47, Calendar No. 38,739PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiff had summary judgment against defendants, who are husband and wife, for deficiency on mortgage foreclosure.

March 11, 1931, defendants executed to plaintiff a joint and several note for $55,000, secured by mortgage on real estate. January 23,1933, plaintiff commenced proceedings to foreclose the mortgage by advertisement. Sale was had April 21, 1933, and plaintiff bid in the property for $58,988.86. In plaintiff’s affidavit for summary judgment it is claimed that the amount due at the time of sale was $63,001.05, which included taxes on the property, some of which had been paid by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vincent v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Wood v. ButtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Kies v. WalworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. McPherson v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Moore v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Senters v. Ottawa Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bank of Three Oaks v. Lakefront PropertiesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Cherryland Mall Ltd. PartnershipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Guardian Depositors Corp. v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API