Legal Opinion

Moore v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Kent. (Adsit, J.) Bill to redeem from a statutory foreclosure. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

George I. Moore, in his lifetime, was the owner of the premises covered by the mortgage in controversy in this proceeding. He caused a dwelling-house and barn to be built upon the premises in 1887, under contract for $1,500 with his son-in-law, the defendant. On the completion of the buildings, there remained due to the defendant on the contract, as is claimed by him, the sum of ■$450, for which Mr. Moore gave him a mortgage on .the [premises, July 3, 1888, the same being recorded December .11, 1888. January 14, 1889, George I. Moore and the ■complainant were married.

Complainant alleges by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamb v. JeffreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Powers v. Golden Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. French v. Grand Beach Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. New York Life Insurance v. ErbMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. McCreery v. RoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Cherryland Mall Ltd. PartnershipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Washington Mutual Bank, FA v. Shorebank Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API