Senters v. Ottawa Savings Bank
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
In the present case, plaintiff seeks the discharge of a mortgage as well as damages for slander of title. Defendant was the holder of the real estate mortgage that defendant foreclosed by advertisement. Defendant asserts a claim against the property in the amount it paid to redeem the property from a construction lien foreclosure sale. We find that plaintiff has complied with the clear language of the redemption statute and that defendant is not entitled to a lien on the property in the amount it paid to redeem the property from a prior foreclosure sale. The decision of the Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Gordon Grossman Building Co. v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Cheff v. HaanMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Cameron v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- G. F. Sanborn Co. v. AlstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Bank of America Na v. First American Title Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- Conlin v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- First National Bank of DeWitt v. CruthisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Beaty v. Hertzberg & Golden, PcMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.