Legal Opinion

Senters v. Ottawa Savings Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1993No. 94637, (Calendar No. 14)PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

In the present case, plaintiff seeks the discharge of a mortgage as well as damages for slander of title. Defendant was the holder of the real estate mortgage that defendant foreclosed by advertisement. Defendant asserts a claim against the property in the amount it paid to redeem the property from a construction lien foreclosure sale. We find that plaintiff has complied with the clear language of the redemption statute and that defendant is not entitled to a lien on the property in the amount it paid to redeem the property from a prior foreclosure sale. The decision of the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Gordon Grossman Building Co. v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Cheff v. HaanMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Cameron v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. G. F. Sanborn Co. v. AlstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bank of America Na v. First American Title Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Conlin v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. First National Bank of DeWitt v. CruthisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Beaty v. Hertzberg & Golden, PcMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API