Legal Opinion
McPherson v. Gregory
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 1935No. Docket No. 89, Calendar No. 38,364PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, C. J.
Plaintiff, receiver of the Pontiac Commercial & Savings Bank, sued defendants to recover judgment upon five separate promissory notes given by defendants to the bank. The form of the notes, except numbers, dates and amounts, was substantially as follows:
“No. 169479 $2,500
“Pontiac, Mich., Feb. 22, 1931.
“Ninety days after date, for value received; we the undersigned, being husband and wife, jointly promise to pay to the order of the Pontiac Commercial and Savings Bank, two thousand five hundred and 00/100 dollars at said bank with interest at seven per cent, per annum, payable annually. All…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edwards & Chamberlin Hardware Co. v. PethickMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Duncan v. KirkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Ehinger v. FiskeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Montz v. ReutterMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Wilmarth v. BuysMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Ever Krisp Food Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Michigan National Bank—Michiana v. Chrystler (In Re Trickett)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
- Albert Fetter and Mary Louise Fetter, His Wife, Jointly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- New York Life Insurance v. ErbMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.