Legal Opinion
City of Vallejo v. Ncorp4, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided September 29, 2017No. A149907PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPollak, Acting P.J.
*1080The City of Vallejo (Vallejo or city) appeals from the denial of its request for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the operation of a medical marijuana dispensary within the city. The trial court concluded that the city's ordinance conferring limited immunity for the operation of such a dispensary conditioned on the prior payment of a business tax imposes an *1081unconstitutional ex post facto condition and therefore may not be enforced. We disagree and therefore shall reverse the order.
Background
Vallejo's zoning code does not recognize medical marijuana dispensaries as a permitted *743land use…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Sahlolbei v. Providence Healthcare, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- City of Corona v. NaullsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Melton v. City of San PabloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Urgent Care Med. Servs. v. City of Pasadena, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Chang v. County of SiskiyouDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Lo v. County of SiskiyouDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- P. ex. rel., City Attorney of the City of San Jose v. Revere Group, LLC CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Urgent Care Medical Services v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.