Legal Opinion
Urgent Care Med. Servs. v. City of Pasadena
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided March 5, 2018No. B277827; B277868PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
*1088INTRODUCTION
The City of Pasadena filed a nuisance abatement action against several businesses and individuals related to medical marijuana dispensaries, which are prohibited by the Pasadena Municipal Code (PMC). The defendants in that action later filed a lawsuit against the City of Pasadena, and the two cases were deemed related. In each of the two actions, the trial *894court granted Pasadena's request for injunctions, prohibiting defendants from operating their medical marijuana dispensaries in Pasadena. The defendants appealed from each order, and we consolidated the appeals.
On appeal,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- IT Corp. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- City of Claremont v. KruseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- City of Costa Mesa v. SofferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Save Lafayette Trees v. City of Lafayette, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Trees v. City of Lafayette, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- (PS) Gifford v. Hornbrook Fire Protection DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- BBBB Bonding Corp. v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- City of Montclair v. Green Lotus Entertainment CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.