Legal Opinion

Seawell v. Carolina Central Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

A PbtitioN to Ejsheae, this case, reported in 132 N. C., 856.

1Opinion of the Court

Glare, C. T.

This is a petition to* .rehear our opinion in this case, 132 N. C., 856. The chief exception relied on is' the refusal of the Judge to non-suit the plaintiff, on the ground that there was no evidence. The plaintiff, who was a candidate for Lieutenant-Governor of this State, had gone *516in Ms canvass of the State to speak at a town where tbe party whose candidate he was was unpopular. He went bach to the railroad station to take the train, and while at the station, with a mileage ticket in his pocket, awaiting the arrival of the train, a mob came up and threw eggs at him, striking him…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spohn v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. New Orleans, St. Louis & Chicago Railroad v. BurkeMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. PillsburyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Seawell v. Carolina Central RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. State v. McCourry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Munick v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Munick v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Hill v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Harrill v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API