Munick v. . Durham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The water-works in the city of Durham are owned by the municipality and are operated by it under the supervision of the defendant Board of Water Commissioners. Among their employees was one Harvey Bolton, who had general charge and supervision of said water system, and among whose duties it was, assisted by others under his supervision, to keep the books containing the accounts against all customers purchasing water, to render statements to said consumers for the water used by them, and collect all sums due and to give receipts upon payment of said bills.
This is an action by the plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roberts v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Britton v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Cook v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Bucken v. South & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Daniel v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Medlin v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Corene Antoinette Lyon v. Michael CareyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- City of Miami v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. ReddickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- John Michael Borneman v. United States of America, John Michael Borneman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.