Legal Opinion

Munick v. City of Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1921PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Calvert, Jat April Term, 1920, of Durham. Tbe water-works in the city of Durham are owned by the municipality and are operated by it under the supervision of the defendant Board of.' Water Commissioners.

Read the full summary

Appeal by plaintiff from Calvert, Jat April Term, 1920, of Durham. Tbe water-works in the city of Durham are owned by the municipality and are operated by it under the supervision of the defendant Board of.' Water Commissioners. Among their employees was one Harvey Bolton,, who had general charge and supervision of said water system, and. among whose duties it was, assisted by others under his supervision, to.' keep the books containing the accounts against all customers purchasing; water, to render statements to said consumers for the water used by them, and collect all sums due and to give…

1Opinion of the CourtClabic, C. J.

The testimony for the plaintiff presents one of the most singular occurrences that has come to this Court. The defendant offered no evidence, and the nonsuit was granted on the uncontradicted testimony for the plaintiff, as above set out. It is, therefore, taken as true, with all the inferences from it in the most favorable light to the plaintiff. But indeed there seems to he but one that could be drawn from it. The plaintiff, an old and feeble man, went to the water company on receiving a notice sent by it to pay his bill. He handed the clerk the money, and she gave him a receipt. A part of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Britton v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. Cook v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. Bucken v. South & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Daniel v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Corene Antoinette Lyon v. Michael CareyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. ReddickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Fussell v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Friedell v. Blakely Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Fussell v. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API