Legal Opinion

Harrill v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 12, 1903PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages of the defendant, a domestic corporation of North Carolina, on account of the death of his intestate, Jake Metcalf, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The intestate was a resident of South Carolina and was killed in that State while engaged in trying to drive an engine and cars over the railroad bridge and trestle at Buffalo Creek. The bridge and trestle were on the line of the railroad of the South Carolina and Georgia Extension Railway Company of South Carolina, a domestic corporation of that State. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. State v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. In Re Estate of MayoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  4. Nelson v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1892
  5. Harrison v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wise v. . HollowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Lowe's North Wilkesboro Hardware, Inc. v. The Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  3. State v. . BetheaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Britton v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Butler v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API