Legal Opinion
Demarest v. Heck
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 3, 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
84 N.J. Super. 100 (1964)
201 A.2d 75
BOROUGH OF DEMAREST, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FRED HECK AND MILDRED HECK, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 13, 1964.
Decided June 3, 1964.
Before Judges GAULKIN, FOLEY and LEWIS.
Mr. William A. Fasolo argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Francis A. McEntee argued the cause for respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by LEWIS, J.A.D.
Plaintiff Borough of Demarest appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, denying injunctive relief from alleged violations of its zoning…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Telefilm, Inc. v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- MAYOR, & C., OF ALPINE BOROUGH v. BrewsterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Chudnov v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Parks v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF TILLAMOOK CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Murphy v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Clearview Estates, Inc. v. Mountain LakesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Hazzard v. West Goshen Township Board of Adjustment, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.