Legal Opinion
Robert L. Mendenhall and Cmi Corporation v. Barber-Greene Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant. Robert C. Mendenhall and Cmi Corporation v. Astec Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 14, 1994No. 92-1244PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
26 F.3d 1573
63 USLW 2016, 31 U.S.P.Q.2d 1001
Robert L. MENDENHALL and CMI Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
BARBER-GREENE COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Appellant.
Robert C. MENDENHALL and CMI Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 91-1109, 91-1131, 91-1317 and 92-1244.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
June 8, 1994.
As Corrected on Grant of Rehearing
Sept. 14, 1994.
Richard S. Florsheim, Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, WI, argued for plaintiffs-appellants in Nos. 91-1109, -1131, and plaintiffs-appellees in Nos. 91-1317 and 92-1244. Jerry J.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Applegate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Perri v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001