Legal Opinion
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 5, 2001No. 00-1241Published
1Opinion of the Court
238 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
LITTON SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HONEYWELL INC., Defendant-Appellee.
00-1241
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DECIDED: February 5, 2001
Appealed from: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Senior Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer [Copyrighted Material Omitted]
John G. Roberts, Jr., Hogan & Hartson L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Catherine E. Stetson. Of counsel on the brief were Frederick A. Lorig, and Sidford L. Brown, Bright & Lorig of Los Angeles, California; Rory J.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Hughes Aircraft Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.