Legal Opinion
Csulik v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 2000No. 1998-0772PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 17.] CSULIK, EXECUTOR, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Csulik v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.,
2000-Ohio-262.] Motor vehicles—Insurance—Phrase “due by law” in policy regarding uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage is ambiguous and susceptible of more than one interpretation—Ambiguity in contract language must be construed strictly against the insurer and liberally in favor of the insured. (No. 98-772—Submitted April 21, 1999 at the Hardin County and Ohio Northern…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Ross v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Landis v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Kraly v. VannewkirkOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Miller v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ohayon v. Safeco Ins. Co. of IllinoisOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Black v. Allstate Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- Progressive Ins. Co. v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Shartle v. Allstate Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001