Legal Opinion

Fuller v. James Murphy Harms Supply Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1929No. File No. 6315PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

In the year 1918 and prior thereto, James Murphy Haims Supply Company, a corporation, of which James Murphy was president and active manager and principal stockholder (which will be hereinafter referred to as the Murphy Corporation), was conducting a machine and implement business at Hitchcock in Beadle county, S. D. At about that time there was incorporated for the purpose of conducting a merchandising enterprise in the same town of Hitchcock a concern known as the Farmers’ Co-operative Supply Company of Hitchcock, S. D. (which will be hereinafter referred to as the Co-operative…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keyes v. BaskervilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Fuller v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Hanson v. FieslerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Williamson v. Voedisch Jewelry Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bunker v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Engler v. Ipswich Printing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Warren v. LincolnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. First National Bank v. WollmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Fuller v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. First National Bank v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API