Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Anderson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1929No. File No. 6314PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The facts involved in this appeal are fully set out in the opinion this day filed in the case of Fuller v. James Murphy Harms Supply Company, a corporation, and the Hitchcock State Bank, 54 S. D. —, 223 N. W. 713, to which reference is hereby made.

The situation here, however, differs from case No. 6315, in that one of the defendants in this action is L. O. Anderson, as administrator of the estate of James Murphy; deceased. In this action a judgment may be, and in fact was, rendered against such administrator. In this action the plaintiff, who was a party, was permitted to testify as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fuller v. James Murphy Harms Supply Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Williamson v. Voedisch Jewelry Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hofemann v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Payne v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Warfield v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API