Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Wollman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1929No. File No. 6405PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULLER, C.

Prior to the events of this controversy, the defendant and respondent Feeney held a promissory note payable to himself on March 1, 1925, in the sum of $750. He had written his signature on the back of the note in unqualified indorsement thereof, and had placed the same in the hands of a 'bank at Harrold. The note was secured by a second mortgage on lands in Sulty county. On February 14, 1921, Feeney entered into a contract with one Dehart for the exchange of properties. As a part of the transaction Dehart was to convey to Feeney certain property in the city of Huron and Feeney was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stebbins v. LardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Thompson v. McKeeSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888
  3. Jones Lumber & Mercantile Co. v. FarisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Fuller v. James Murphy Harms Supply Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Miller v. WaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. First Natl. Bank v. WollmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Waddell v. CarySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API