Hanson v. Fiesler
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
This is an action brought on an alleged verbal contract to will or deed to- plaintiff a farm' in Charles Mix county, in consideration of his providing a living for Benedict Thompson, the owner of the farm, and Ingeborg Thompson, his wife, during their lifetime.
The action is brought against he administratrix of Thompson’s estate and Inger Fiesler and Julia Lehm, as his only heirs. The complaint sets forth the alleged verbal contract, in substance, as follows:
“Falintiff agreed to live upon the said land and to- farm and cultivate the same as long as the said Benedict Thompson and his wife,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- St. John v. LoflandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- McElhenney v. HendricksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Engholm v. EkremNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Baker v. BakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Ford v. FordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Speck v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Seitz v. SitzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Ward v. MelbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Fuller v. James Murphy Harms Supply Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Miller v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.