Legal Opinion
State v. Paulino
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 29, 1991No. 9426PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of the crime of possessing cocaine with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).1 The defendant was sentenced to twenty years in prison. He claims that the trial court improperly admitted inculpatory hear*88say statements made by a third party, and improperly permitted unfairly prejudicial testimony by a prosecution witness, thereby denying him his federal and state constitutional rights to due process. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury could reasonably have found the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Anderson v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PaulinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. IndrisanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. Lo SaccoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. PaulinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992